Income Taxes and Short Memories

2008 Campaign Baloney

Charley Rangel "forgot" about the income on his off-shore rental properties and thus forgot to report the income to the IRS.  Tim Geithner also "forgot" about some income and failed to pay $34,000 in income taxes and was exempted by the IRS for penalties and interest.  Tom Daschle "suddenly remembered" that he had not reported income nor pay taxes amounting to $134,000 to the IRS and was also exempted from penalties and interest by the IRS.  I seriously doubt that Mr. Rangel will have to pay any penalties or interest for his short-term yet convenient memory loss about his off-shore properties either.  And apparently several other appointments by Obama have had second thoughts about the accuracy of the 1040 Forms and have elected to stay out of the limelight and away from the Senate Sub-Committee to answer confirmation questions about their taxes, nannies, and grounds-keepers.

Gee Whiz and Golly - these BOZOS are supposed to be the great thinkers in our wonderful society and one is even in charge of the Treasury.  I hope someone has an extra key for Geithner in the event he can't find the key to his office to oversee trillions of dollars.  I wonder if this is the "Change" that we can believe in.  And the answer is "So far so good!"

It appears that the late Leona Helmsley (widow of the hotel magnate) was very correct when she said, "Only little people pay taxes!"

0

Change - War against Islamic Terrorists - Race Card

2008 Campaign Baloney

Not my words or stats, just got ‘em over the Internet - Jim

 
Whatever your politics, however you lean, however you feel about the current administration, this report should open some eyes, but not all will see the truth . . .

_____________________________________________________

Military losses, 1980 through 2006

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf

 As tragic as the loss of any member of the US Armed Forces is, consider the following statistics:  The annual fatalities of military members while actively serving in the armed forces from 1980 through 2006:

1980 ......... 2,392 (Carter Year)

1981 ......... 2,380 (Reagan Year)
1984 ......... 1,999 (Reagan Year)
1988 ......... 1,819 (Reagan Year)

1989 ......... 1,636 (George HW Year)

1990 ......... 1,508 (George HW Year)
1991 ......... 1,787 (George HW Year)
1992 ......... 1,293 (George HW Year)

1993 ......... 1,213 ( Clinton Year)
1994 ......... 1,075 ( Clinton Year)
1995 ......... 2,465 ( Clinton Year)
1996 ......... 2,318 (Clinton Year)         Clinton years (1993-2000):  14,000 deaths
1997 ............ 817 ( Clinton Year)
1998 ......... 2,252 ( Clinton Year)
1999 ......... 1,984 ( Clinton Year)
2000 ......... 1,983 ( Clinton Year)

2001 ............ 890 (George W Year)
2002 ......... 1,007 (George W Year)
2003 ......... 1,410 (George W Year)
2004 ......... 1,887 (George W Year)   George W years (2001-2006):  7,932 deaths
2005 ............ 919 (George W Year)
2006............. 920 (George W Year)

2007............. 899 (George W Year)
       

These figures mean that the loss from the two latest conflicts in the Middle East are LESS than the loss of military personnel during Bill Clinton's presidency; when America wasn't even involved in a war!  

And, I was even more shocked when I read that in 1980, during the reign of President (Nobel Peace (Peanuts) Prize winner) Jimmy Carter, there were 2,392 US military fatalities!

These figures indicate that many members of our alleged elite Media and our elitist Politicians will pick and choose the information on which they report.  

Of course, we all know that they present only those ‘facts’ that support their agenda-driven reporting. Nevertheless, why do so many of them march in lock step to twist the truth? Where do so many of them get their marching orders for their agenda? 

Obviously, there is one shared agenda, and I believe it is clear it comes from the most powerful Democratic family of the decade.

Do you want further proof? Consider the latest census of Americans. It shows the following FACTS about the distribution of American citizens, by RACE/COLOR:
European descent ............................ 69.12%
Hispanic ...........................................12.5%
Black ................................................12.3%
Asian ................................................. 3.7%
Native American ................................ 1.0%
Other .................................................. 2.6%

Now... here are the fatalities by RACE/COLOR over the past three years in Iraqi Freedom:

European descent (white) .................74.31%
Hispanic ......................................... ..10.74%
Black .................................................. 9.67%
Asian .................................................. 1.81%
Native American .................................1.09%
Other .................................................... .033%

Surprised again?  Seems clear that the point is our mainstream elite media continues to spin these figures because of their political stance and their political agenda (who said anything about NEWS? – NEWS has nothing to do with what they say or read from the prompter). Nothing!

 It's ALL about politics and some politicians, who are now famous for turning American against American for a vote. (Consider Slick Willy and his comments just recently made about South Carolina, Jesse Jackson, and the 'blacks' voting for the 'black' candidates); or Hillary's stump speech after her Super Tuesday 'victory' stating that the current administration does not 'listen' to anyone and continues the war costing precious American lives. 

Yes, you may have to agree with Ms. Clinton, but she should be made to acknowledge her own husband's administration, without having an actual war, sent more soldiers to death during his regime-while also forcing the military to release Osama Bin Laden when we actually had him detained.

I hope that during the time between now and November, that intelligent Americans can decipher the facts from the spin and the spinners from the leaders; those who seek even more power from those that seek justice, the dividers from the uniters.

Over the next months let’s carefully listen, ask the candidates to DEFINE THEIR TERMS, see, and hear who tries to divide or Change our nation; and who really wants to unite our nation. 

  1. Who wants to control how our money is spent and who wants our money spent the way we would spend it?
  2. Who seeks power and who seeks justice? 
  3. Who spins the facts and who is genuine?
  4. Who is in the race to really help OUR country?


(Congressional Research Service publishes these statistics, and they may be confirmed by anyone at:  http://wwwfas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf )


Search